Mosque @ Ground Zero (burning the Quran?)


Using name ‘Cordoba Initiative’ ‘mystifying’

Published: Wednesday, September 15, 2010


By Rev. Bill Keane

EVERY so often, I find myself being morally obligated to publicly repudiate something, and make it very clear where I stand. It becomes necessary, if you’re going to occupy the pulpit, to stand up and be clearly counted.

And so, we had a pastor of the Dove World Outreach and copycats threatening to burn copies of the Quran on the anniversary of Sept. 11. Because silence can imply assent, I see no choice but to openly reject this idea in no uncertain terms. It’s juvenile, it’s not biblical, it’s dangerous.

Churches and organizations choose their names with deliberate, symbolic intention. With the dove being a sign of peace, how incongruous it is for Dove World Outreach to be acting with such hostility.

The fact is that not only is it tempting, it’s downright simple to abandon responsibility by saying, truthfully, that I personally had nothing to do with the offense in question.

But no matter how isolated or unusual, when a disgraceful ideology is given a large platform and is justified by the use and abuse of the Christian faith, then faithful Christians have to speak out. If we don’t answer for hatred in our wider family, we can’t speak with integrity about God’s love for the whole world.

When crazy ideologies are enacted, it’s not enough for Christians to say, “Our faith isn’t like that.” It’s apparent that some in the faith think it is. It’s not enough to distance ourselves from evil in our house. When it arises, we have to own it, engage it and even if we didn’t cause it, we have to try to put a stop to it.

This is a principle good Christians have always lived by, and it’s a principle I respectfully suggest for good Muslims as well.

There’s no question that those who would like to build an Islamic community center two blocks from Ground Zero have that right. The question is: Are they right?

Community houses and religious institutions choose names for a reason, which is why the Cordoba Initiative, which proposed the Islamic project, jumped out at me. The city of Cordoba was the center in Iberia of the old Islamic empire, something known as the caliphate. The restoration of this caliphate is something Osama bin Laden and his ilk have called for.

People can bandy about what the intentions of the Cordoba Initiative were, but that doesn’t matter. What matters is what “Cordoba” means to multitudes of Islamic terrorists. To them, Cordoba is a blatant reference to the stated goals behind bringing down the World Trade Center.

As the word spread about this, the project’s name was changed to Park 51, a street address, but I find it incredibly mystifying that thoughtful people would have a “Cordoba” initiative anywhere in lower Manhattan.

The knee-jerk response to those who question the project is to say they’re bigots or “Islamophobic.” Maybe, they’re just sensitive and intelligent.

We’ve all seen how quickly Louis Farrakhan can organize huge gatherings at the Lincoln Memorial, giving voice to all manner of things. We see how quickly mass marches emerge around the world when a European cartoonist depicts the Prophet Muhammad.

I know it’s reprehensible for someone to deliberately burn the Quran. But where is the in-house, widespread outrage when young Afghan girls going to school get burned with acid thrown by Islamic radicals? Where are the in-house, mass demonstrations when schools for Islamic women get bombed, and when young Islamic women are systematically targeted with poison gas? Aren’t people more holy than books?

I’ve heard from Christian apologists that Islam is a religion of peace, that the radicals are a minority who have hijacked the religion. So, where is the majority willing to take back the plane?

Over the last nine years, if there had been large Islamic public protests against al-Qaida and its allies, the building of Park 51 might not have mattered.

In its present form, of course, the community center should be allowed. But, I don’t think it should be built. As a Christian and an American, I respect it, but I don’t support it.

The Rev. Bill Keane is senior minister at First Baptist Church of Branford. This article is excerpted from a sermon he gave Sunday. From October 2001 through June 2002, under the auspices of the Salvation Army, Keane worked as a chaplain at Ground Zero.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: